I therefore question why it needs to be used in approaches to understanding the fundamental laws of physics. Then, when time and space arose, geometry and mathematics still were extremly simple. There are plenty of unsettled foundational issues in HEP and cosmology crying for answers. Thanks for your response; I look forward to reading your paper! I believe that indeed it does.
But are the continuations unique? January 8, at 2: LHC results will kill supersymmetry theory, will kill string theory, will kill big bang theory. Spekkens in the direction of bisimulation in the comments section of the FQXi post. The real fun and new questions are at the extremes where such formulas break down.
In a discrete fractal or conformal model of nature, this assumption fails badly.
Fqxi essay contest 2012
I can see how that would be useful. They call their approach Causal Dynamical Triangulations. December 10, at The idea is to get closer to the grounding or foundations of our theories, the reason behind why they are possible and why we so imagine them.
May 26, at 8: He suggests that energy is essesential and I fail to see how this is so.
Robert Spekkens wins first prize in FQXi essay contest
By itself, information cannot interact with another piece of information to cause a third piece of information to exist. These points were covered in my essay http: May 30, at 7: Essah the commodity essqy are dug in on bit.
December 11, at 5: This IA64 architecture, the road less traveled, which Oracle wanted to block. There were essays that were placed either much lower or much higher in the results than they deserved.
How our modern physicists use groups to pigeonhole their strung together theories tells us nothing hew really, beyond fqdi theory itself. Create a free website or blog at WordPress. About special relativity- general relativity relation we have debated here. Advanced Stellar fqxi essay contest Propulsion Systems.
Fqxi essay contest
The methods used by Hawking et al were based on semi-classical approximations and reduced systems of quantum cosmology. There must be very active and influental academic lobbers behind this kind of decision. However, quantum mechanics is not a stochastic physics.
See constant random variable. December 5, at 7: If someone is identified to you as an author who eszay papers to viXra how should you judge their status? Lucido suggests that consistency is an ontological force of nature.
Yet there is no good reason to think this pertains to a pure quantum state. There are indeed plenty of problems but very few convincing solutions from PI or anywhere else in recent years. December 12, at 4: The measurement problem in quantum physics is the logical result of essesential matter. In any case, to my opinion viXra makes a wonderful service for the science during a period when big contesr dominates science and freedom of though does not prevail.
December 6, at 2: May 25, at 3: This was carried on by Florin Moldoveanu, who took this much further. Thank you for the dialog and the documentations. In fact the distribution is ewsay flat within the statistical error bars not shown and there are plenty of viXra authors who did well. Does this render Mr.
The best answers, up to now, are the creation of new particles in quantum field theory, the split of strings in QCD and string theory, and renormalisation group connecting multiple scales of lenghts.