That 76a allows GN to appear on the embedded object of the control infinitive is predicted by my analysis in the following way. We saw several examples of these predicates above, in connection with our discussion of non-agreement in Russian. Unaccusative Syntax in Russian Instead, there is a limited set of syntactic relations, determined by categories and their projections. Here I discuss five diagnostics posited for unaccusativity in Russian and propose a structure that accounts for each of them.
The sentence in 15 shows that genitive case is in fact not obligatory, thus raising the question as to what kind of semantic difference might exist between 14b and We saw several examples of these predicates above, in connection with our discussion of non-agreement in Russian. Vanja ne Vojnu i Mir. Since transitive vP constitutes a strong Phase, the entire vP is transferred to both the phonological and semantic components. In b , the locative PP right-adjoins to the unaccusative VP. Consider the data in repeated from above.
Anna ne kupila knigi.
stephanie harves dissertation
Only now, twenty years later, do various theoretical developments allow us to take a stand and improve upon his analysis. The occurrence of non-agreeing predicates has played a significant role in my syntactic analysis of three of the diagnostics proposed for unaccusativity in Russian.
The farmer loaded the truck with hay. We return to this observation below.
Babby has shown that these non-agreeing predicates are only allowed in the absence of an agentive external argument. Further challenges to treating Gen-Neg as a diagnostic for unaccusativity come from examples where seemingly unergative predicates appear to allow genitive to appear on their external arguments. Thus, if an existential closure account of the interpretation of NPs is to be maintained, it cannot be based solely on Case-checking chains in the syntax cf.
Yet, in order for the internal NP to match some feature with Neg0, V0 must, in some way, be defective with respect to the!
This indicates that the Theme is in fact not an internal argument. Hence, the b examples above are correctly ruled out by our analysis.
(PDF) Unaccusative Syntax in Russian | Stephanie Harves –
In particular, studies of intransitive predicates, which alternate between unergative dissfrtation unaccusative syntax, offer strong evidence in favor of an approach to the lexicon-syntax interface that is not dependent on the semantic properties of verbs see Arad for thorough discussion. Mnogo travy naroslo v parke. Despite the many syntactic differences between English and Russian, Russian patterns with English in terms of licensing requirements on distributivity.
A few are repeated in Asymmetries in the scope of Russian negation. It is shown that certain syntactic properties of unaccusativity in Russian apply not only to intransitive predicates but to various transitive and copular predicates as well. These facts pattern together with the results of standard tests for verb-raising in Russian.
Genitive of negation and the existential paradox. Given this view, it is unnecessary to label arguments as Agents or Patients pre-syntactically. Their interpretation is determined by their syntactic position in the tree.
All features are valued overtly, in a single syntactic derivation, via the local probe-goal operation AGREE. These domains are referred to as Phases.
Unaccusative Syntax in Russian
Help Center Find new research papers in: Jim Lavine was also someone I could always rely on for many things, whether it be asking for comments on a paper or dissertation! Movement and Silence in the English have yet to Imperfective passives in Russian are formed via —sja suffixation, while perfective passives are formed via —en suffixation, as shown in below. V N Babyonyshev Odin stakan upal so stola.
John gave Mary a book. Rather, Neg0 simply carries a polarity feature, which for Brown, is all that is necessary to license GN. The Russian verb, Oslo studies in language 4 1ed.
Nothing crucial hinges on this analysis of the EPP, however. If the verb lacked object! In the transitive alternant, V0 is non-defective and values accusative Case on the internal argument, while non-defective T0 values nominative on the external argument.
However, b shows that that dissertahion Target or Subject Matter is more restricted.
Zoliswa Mali and Neil Myler.